Rice Broocks, Answering History's
Question: Man, Myth, Messiah, Nashville:
W Publishing Group/Thomas Nelson, 2016.
Review by Clark BatesMarch 17, 2016
Author
Rice Broocks is co-founder of Every Nation church, spreading it's
family of congregants over seventy nations. Having spent many years
in both campus ministry and full time pastoral ministry, Broocks has
a finger clearly placed on the pulse of this generation's young
believer. Having authored more than four books in his time, Broocks
has found public notoriety with his previous work, God's
Not Dead
and the feature film attached to it. Now, the author has focused his
apologetic mind toward the person and nature of Jesus Christ in his
newest release, Man,
Myth, Messiah,
also to have been acquired for film in the upcoming God's
Not Dead 2
by PureFlix Entertainment.
Having
borrowed the concept of C.S. Lewis' famous Jesus apologetic of “Liar,
Lunatic, or Lord,” Rice Broocks has updated it for the modern era
with “Man, Myth, or Messiah.” In doing this the author clearly
sets forth the thematic element of his latest work, focusing
specifically on the historicity and believability of the life, death
and resurrection of Jesus Christ. The writing style is reminiscent
of the author's earlier apologetic work, God's
Not Dead, in
it's efforts to take involved topics and present them in a more
palatable discourse for the lay reader. For Broocks, the thesis of
his work is summed up in the early pages of the introduction, where
he writes, “The goal of this book is to build confidence in the
reader that Jesus Christ was not only a real person, but that He was
the promised Messiah (Savior) and the Son of God.”1
Broocks
presents a careful layout of ten chapters, eight of which are
designed to answer the various historical questions and claims
surrounding the life and death of Jesus of Nazareth, as well as the
reliability of the biblical source documents that speak to this
event. The closing chapters are set aside as a call to belief and
discipleship in Jesus on the basis of what has been determined in the
prior readings. The author makes every effort to include areas in
which even skeptical scholars concede the biblical perspective
regarding the person of Jesus Christ, quoting often from scholars
such as Bart Ehrman.
Much
of the writing regarding the reliability of the biblical resurrection
accounts, borrows from the work of Gary Habermas and Mike Licona,
while the chapter on acceptance of miracles seeks the wisdom of
scholars such as William Lane Craig and Craig Keener, while also
accessing the early writings of church fathers of Athanasius and
Irenaeus. Throughout the the text, Broocks conveys the thoughts an
evidences of many previous scholars and relays them with a
conventional tone and style, making what would otherwise be a lengthy
and potentially tedious work a refreshing and informative survey.
The evangelistic heart of author is clear throughout, as he
repeatedly identifies the underlying spiritual warfare that creates
the excess doubt of the modern skeptical age, and his call to
salvation and discipleship at the close of the book creates a
healthy, 250 page witnessing tool.
With
a book of this quality it is difficult to accept any critical aspects
of it, but given that no work is without some dissension, Man,
Myth Messiah
is not alone. Granted, much of the criticism that may come from
inside the Christian faith reduces to perspective rather than error,
but is still worth noting. Early on in the author's writing, he
takes the stance of a there existing a battle between science and
religion. While this is a common belief on the popular level, much
of the debate that exists now, does so on more amiable terms.
Setting a tone of warfare in a book geared toward a popular level
audience tends to promote animosity before any real engagement takes
place. This is the similar tone found in Broock's previous work, and
while it is not disputed that there are those with great animus on
both sides of the discussion, it would be best to present the
positive case for the co-existence of both rather than a negative
perspective of incoming warfare.
An
underlying feature of the work is the use of critical scholars
assessments of the facts presented, but only those positions that
agree. In the many quotations of Bart Ehrman, not one gives his
alternate position to the validity of the facts presented. While the
author does state at the outset that his desire is not to create and
in-depth investigation into modern biblical scholarship, presenting
the case in this way can create a skewed perspective. In doing this,
the author does bolster support for his consistent position that the
only reason scholars would reject the objective data regarding Jesus
and the resurrection is a lack of desire to be accountable to someone
other than themselves. This is certainly the pastoral side of
Broocks, and to a certain extent is true. However, to claim that all
who see the evidence and deny it are seeking to avoid divine
accountability paints too broad a brush and, given the purpose of the
text to reach a large audience, may either turn off curious
unbelievers to the greater message or influence new believers into
thinking they have a deeper insight into the reasoning of unbelievers
that simply is not necessarily true.
Having
said that, neither of these points or any other small critiques that
might be addressed are damaging enough to detract , form the overall
value of this work. The author's clear understanding of the case for
Jesus of Nazareth and the minimal facts regarding his resurrection
are apparent with the brevity and depth of what is presented.
Broocks methodically disassembles the counter theories of Jesus as a
reinterpreted myth and those of the survivability of Roman
crucifixion. The format of the chapters begins and proceeds in a
logical, sequential order, beginning with the argument, then the
reliability of the source documents and building upon each position
as a craftsman might establish the cornerstones of a church.
The
greatest value of this book is its ability to reach a broad audience.
Much of what is written regarding the topic of the historical Jesus
and the resurrection exist primarily as collegiate textbooks. As the
author says quite clearly,
“It's
humbling to me to be in the presence of men and women who have
dedicated their hearts and minds to communicating the truth of the
faith using their academic platform or profession. For some reason,
much of their great wisdom and writing doesn't often make it down to
the grass-roots level and make the impact that it could on the
average believer.”2
It's because of this that writings like the author's are so deeply needed. Each chapter provides detailed notes for each scholar cited, providing ample opportunity for the reader, who so desires, to pursue a deeper study. Given the tantalizing amount of information presented in this work, it will be no surprise if many readers seek to avail themselves of more comprehensive texts on the subject.
What
Mr. Broocks has delivered with Man, Myth Messiah
is nothing short of a modern day Case for Christ.
He has done it in a manner enviable of many
apologists-turned-writers and succeeded in breaking through the wall
of academia into the public square. The added influence of the film
adaptation of this work will only benefit its readership and create a
large awareness of the text. While the book itself does not cover
any “new” information regarding the historicity of Christ, it
doesn't need to. The bulk of material that has existed for ages has
gone largely unnoticed and it may be that a book such as this is
exactly what will bring it to light. This book is a valuable
addition to any library, be it a pastor's study, a student's
references or a lay person's home collection. It is heartily
recommended for all readers of mid to late teen years and forward.
Clark
Bates is a graduate of Liberty Baptist Theological Seminary and
manages an apologetics and theology blog at
http://www.exejesushermeneutics.blogspot.com.
I
received this book free from W Publishing Group and Thomas Nelson
Publishers as part of their BookLookBloggers.com book review bloggers
program. I was not required to write a positive review. The opinions
I have expressed are my own. I am disclosing this in accordance with
the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: “Guides
Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.”
1Rice
Broocks, Answering History's Question: Man, Myth, Messiah,
(Nashville: W Publishing Group/ Thomas Nelson, 2016), xxii.
2Broocks,
Man, Myth, Messiah, 219.
No comments:
Post a Comment